Accurate conductivity (EC) measurements are critical in labs, industrial processes, and water treatment. However, arhieving reliable and repeatable results is often more challenging than expected.
This article highlights the most common challenges in conductivity calibration and explanis how modern calibration equiment approaches help reduce uncertainty and improve reliability.
The challenge
Conductivity is highly temperature dependent. Even small temperature variations can cause EC readings to drift, leading to inconsistent results if compensation is incorrect or missing.
Why it matters
Incorrect temperature compensation increases measurement uncertainty and can cause false out-of-spec results, especially in low-conductivity applications.
Modern calibaration approach
Using calibration methods that include built-in temperature measurement and automatic compensation helps ensure stable, comparable results under real operating conditions.
The challenge
Liquid calibration standards degrade over time and are sensitive to contamination, handling, and storage conditions.
Why it matters
Using outdated or contaminated standards introduces hidden errors and undermines traceability.
Modern calibaration approach
Reference-based calibration methods reduce dependence on physical standards and support electrical verification of the measurement chain.
The challenge
Electrode surfaces and cell constants change over time due to wear, fouling, or coating.
Why it matters
Drift often goes unnoticed, leading to gradually incorrect readings.
Modern calibaration approach
Calibration techniques that allow verification of the sensor’s cell constant help detect degradation early and maintain confidence in results.
The challenge
Biofilm, deposits, and installation effects can influence sensor performance.
Why it matters
Removing sensors for calibration and reinstalling them introduces additional variability and contamination risk.
Modern calibaration approach
At-line or in-line verification makes it possible to evaluate sensor performance without disturbing the process installation.
The challenge
Traditional calibration workflows are time-consuming and disruptive, leading to calibration being postponed or performed less frequently than recommended.
Why it matters
Infrequent calibration increases the risk of undetected drift and compliance issues.
Modern calibaration approach
Simplified, on-site calibration methods lower the threshold for frequent calibration and improve overall control.
The challenge
Calibration errors often occur not because of faulty instruments, but due to inconsistent procedures, skipped steps, or insufficient stabilisation time during calibration.
Why it matters
Small procedural deviations can lead to unreliable conductivity results, reduced repeatability, and documentation that does not stand up to audit or quality review.
Modern calibaration approach
Standardised, SOP-driven calibration workflows help minimise operator dependency and ensure that each calibration is performed consistently, with traceable and reproducible results.
Many of these challenges stem from calibration methods that require sensor removal, laboratory handling, and reliance on liquid standards.
Modern conductivity calibration increasingly focuses on reference-based verification under real process conditions. This approach reduces uncertainty, improves repeatability, and makes calibration easier to integrate into daily operations.
Explore our range of reliable and accurate calibration tools designed for inline conductivity sensors in industrial and hygienic applications.
Our Condutivity Meter validate and calibrate your inline conductivity sensors directly in production — without stopping the process, removing sensors, or introducing uncertainty.
Available in several models, for both low and high conductivity applications, ranging from a PRO to a handheld version.
Our Calibration Laboratory offers a comprehensive range of calibrations within the fields of conductivity, mass flow, and temperature. The laboratory is regularly audited by authorities to ensure that we meet the ISO 17025 standard of technical competence, traceability of results, suitability of reference equipment, and the Quality Assurance/Control system. The laboratory is accredited by DANAK (Danish Accreditation and Metrology Fund), ensuring your equipment will be calibrated to one of the highest international standards.
Search
