In every production facility, from water utilities to pharmaceutical manufacturing, flow is an essential measurement parameter used to control the process. Whether flow is used to monitor production performance or to dose the correct amount of product into a batch, it is crucial that the measured values are reliable and within specification.

Discrepancies in measurement can result in unnecessary use of ingredients, but they can also affect final product quality and production consistency. Product quality is especially critical in pharmaceutical manufacturing, which is why legislation requires frequent calibration of measuring points to ensure compliance and product quality.

To maintain accurate and reliable measurements, flowmeters typically need to be calibrated one to two times per year. This article explains the differences between traditional laboratory calibration and on-site, in-line calibration, and outlines the challenges and benefits associated with each approach.

Why Flow Calibration is Required

Over time, flowmeters drift due to mechanical wear, environmental conditions, and changes in the production process. Even small deviations in measurement can lead to incorrect batching, increased waste, and reduced production consistency.

Reliable flow measurement is therefore essential not only for process control, but also for protecting product quality and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. As a result, frequent calibration of flowmeters is required in many industries to maintain accurate and traceable measurements.

Challenges with Traditional Laboratory Calibration

Traditional laboratory calibration can be a time-consuming and disruptive process. In order to calibrate a flowmeter, it must first be physically removed from the process line, which often requires parts of the production to be shut down. 

Key challenges include

  • Production downtime during removal and reinstallation
  • Risk of mechanical damage during handling and transport
  • Waiting times and logistical delays when using external laboratories
  • Increased risk of contamination if cleaning and reinstallation are insufficient
  • Additional validation efforts after reinstalling the instrument

Together, these factors can significantly extend calibration time and increase the operational impact on prodution.

The Traditional Calibration Workflow

Conventional calibration requires:

  1. Stopping production
  2. Removing the instrument
  3. Transporting it to a calibration laboratory
  4. Performing calibration
  5. Reinstalling and validating the instrument

Each step introduces risk and consumes time. 

What is in-line Flow Calibration?

In-line flow calibration is a method where calibration is performed directly in the production process without removing the flowmeter from the pipework.

Instead of dismounting the instrument and sending it to a laboratory, calibration is carried out on-site by comparing the measured values under actual process conditions.

This approach eliminates the need to remove and reinstall the flowmeter, which reduces downtime and avoids the uncertainties that can be introduced when an instrument is reinstalled in a process. By performing calibration in-line, measurements are verified under the same conditions in which the flowmeter is normally operating.

Benefits of In-line Flow Calibration

Performing flow calibration in-line removes many of the challenges associated with traditional laboratory calibration. Because the flowmeter remains installed in the process, production downtime caused by removal, transport, and reinstallation is significantly reduced.

By calibrating under actual process conditions, uncertainties related to reinstallation are avoided, and calibration activities can be planned more flexibly without reliance on external laboratories.

Laboratory vs In-Line Flow Calibration – Key Differences

Laboratory Calibration

  • Flowmeter is removed from the process
  • Production must be stopped during removal and reinstallation
  • Instrument is transported to a calibration laboratory
  • Risk of mechanical damage during handling and transport
  • Waiting times when using external calibration services
  • Increased risk of contamination during removal and reinstallation
  • Additional validation required after reinstallation

In-Line Calibration

  • Flowmeter remains installed in the process
  • Minimal production downtime during calibration
  • No transport or external handling of the instrument
  • Reduced risk of mechanical damage
  • Greater flexibility in planning calibration activities
  • Reduced contamination risk
  • Measurement results reflect real operating conditions

Key Benefits of In-Line Flow Calibration

Based on these differences, key benefits of in-line flow calibration include:

  • Reduced production downtime
  • Calibration under real process conditions
  • Elimination of reinstallation effects
  • Improved planning flexibility
  • Reduced contamination risk

When Does In-Line Flow Calibration Make Sense?

In-line flow calibration is particularly relevant in production environments where frequent calibration is required and production downtime must be kept to a minimum. In many facilities, flowmeters need to be calibrated one to two times per year, making repeated removal and reinstallation both time-consuming and disruptive.

Processes that involve continuous production, batching, or dosing can be especially affected by downtime associated with laboratory calibration. In such cases, performing calibration directly in the process allows production to continue with minimal interruption.

In-line calibration is also well suited for regulated industries, where product quality and compliance are critical. By calibrating under actual process conditions, measurement results better reflect real operation and reduce uncertainties introduced by removing and reinstalling instruments.

Insacal Flow At Insatech (19)

An In-line Calibration Solution

One example of an on-site, in-line calibration approach is the use of a mobile flow calibration rig that is connected directly to the pipework and compares measured values during operation. This allows calibration to be performed without removing the flowmeter from the process line.

Such solutions make it possible to carry out calibration on-site, reducing downtime associated with transport and external laboratory services. By keeping calibration activities in-house, greater control over planning and contamination risks is maintained.

An example of this type of solution is the Insacal Flowrig, which is designed to perform fully automatic flow calibration directly in production environments and supports a wide range of flow rates.

Summary: Laboratory vs. In-Line Calibration

Traditional laboratory calibration is a well-established method for verifying flowmeter accuracy, but it often requires production to be stopped and the instrument to be removed from the process. Transport, handling, waiting times, and reinstallation can make laboratory calibration time-consuming and introduce additional risks related to downtime, damage, contamination, and measurement uncertainty.

In-line flow calibration offers an alternative approach by performing calibration directly under actual process conditions without removing the flowmeter. This reduces downtime, simplifies planning, and helps ensure that calibration results reflect real operating conditions.

The choice between laboratory calibration and in-line calibration depends on the specific production environment, calibration frequency, and the operational impact of downtime. In many cases, especially where production continuity, product quality, and compliance are critical, in-line calibration can provide significant advantages.

Read more

Flow Calibration Knowledge

Explore insights, calibration guides and real-world cases within flow calibration.

Common Challenges in Flow Calibration

Learn about common flow calibration challenges, including production downtime, long turnaround times, and risks related to handling, transport, and contamination.

Compliance and Flow Calibration

In regulated industries such as pharmaceutical and food production, calibration is closely linked to compliance, documentation, and traceability. This article explains how calibration strategies support traceability, documentation, and confidence in measurement results.

To top

Search